Add Row 
Add 
Understanding the Heritage of Manifest Destiny
On July 23, the Department of Homeland Security posted an intriguing take on American history through John Gast's 1872 painting, American Progress. The artwork portrays a dramatic contrast between the vibrant East and the dark, unsettled West, symbolizing the narrative of manifest destiny — the belief that Americans were destined by God to spread democracy and power across North America. In the post, the Department described this as a 'Heritage to be proud of, a Homeland worth Defending,' sparking conversations about the political implications of such imagery in today’s context.
The Political Implications of Manifest Destiny
Originally coined by John O’Sullivan in 1845, the term manifest destiny represented a partisan stance during a turbulent time in U.S. politics, particularly surrounding the annexation of Texas. O’Sullivan’s rhetoric cloaked efforts for territorial expansion in the guise of a moral imperative to spread democracy. In many respects, the current governmental narrative echoes this sentiment, framing contemporary policy through the lens of nationalism, yet it overlooks key aspects of both the historical narrative and its consequences.
A History of Greed and Opportunity
While manifest destiny is often romanticized, it also included the exploitation and marginalization of Indigenous peoples and enslaved populations. As the U.S. expanded, the ethos of manifest destiny contributed not only to territorial gains but also to the systemic racism that persists today. Understanding this history is important for today’s top wage earners in Philadelphia, who are often at the forefront of economic and cultural discussions regarding equity and social justice.
Reflecting on Our National Identity
The recent social media post by Homeland Security invites a deeper reflection on the narratives we choose to embrace. It suggests a return to themes associated with a historical ideology that many would argue undermines the very democracy it sought to promote. As Philadelphians, the call to assess our own understanding of heritage and national pride is pertinent. What aspects of our history do we embrace, and what lessons do we carry forward into a more equitable future?
As we engage with our country's narrative, it becomes vital to foster conversations about the implications of our shared history on current societal structures. How can we use these reflections to inform our decisions and enhance our community’s understanding of equity and inclusion?
Write A Comment